Looking at measurements of the vertebrae in new-born children, investigators at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, USA, found that differences between the sexes are present at birth rather than developing over time. Results of the study, online in advance of print publication in the Journal of Pediatrics, suggest that this difference is evolutionary, allowing the female spine to adapt to the foetal load during pregnancy.
Using magnetic resonance imagining (MRI), the researchers found that vertebral cross-sectional dimensions, a key structural determinant of the vertebra’s strength, were 10.6% smaller on average in new-born females than in males.
“Human beings are the only mammals in which this difference is seen, and it is one of the few key physiological differences between the sexes,” said Vicente Gilsanz, director of the Research Imaging program at The Saban Research Institute of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and senior author on the study. The reason could be that the spine has to move forward during pregnancy, so that the female can walk and maintain her centre of gravity. Unfortunately, it also imparts a disadvantage in that it increases stress within the vertebrae for all physical activities, resulting in a great susceptibility for fractures later in life.”
“Although we have known that girls had smaller vertebrae than boys, we did not know how early this difference first occurred,” added Gilsanz, who is also professor of radiology at Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California. “Our study indicates that the distinction between sexes is already present at birth, and provides new evidence that this difference begins during prenatal development of the axial skeleton.”
While the mechanisms responsible for the smaller female vertebral body during the foetal stages of skeletal development remain unknown, it likely results from complex interactions involving sex steroids, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor.
In the study, 70 healthy, full-term newborns (35 boys and 35 girls) were measured. Weight, body length, and head and waist circumference did not significantly differ between sexes. Compared to new-born boys, girls had significantly smaller vertebral cross-sectional dimensions—a difference independent of gestational age, birth weight and body length.
The study notes that, over their lifetimes, women also accumulate less bone mass than men, resulting in a two- to four-fold increase in spinal fracture. A deficiency in vertebral growth in girls is associated with greater spinal flexibility and lower peak bone mass in young women, eventually resulting in an increased likelihood of scoliosis as well as osteoporosis in later life.
“While girls are born with a predisposition to developing osteoporosis as older adults, we know that bone development can be optimised with exercise and nutrition,” said Gilsanz. “This is an example of how traits that might predispose an individual to disease can be mitigated through personalised medicine and customised health care, beginning early in life.”